NYC Apartments Cost as Much as Castles (and People Just Don’t Get Why)

This series of pictures of castles and NYC apartments has been trending on the internet.

French_castle

NYC_apartment

Everyone recognizes that real estate in NYC is outrageously expensive. What they fail to recognize is that it’s the city’s rent control and zoning policies since WWII that have prevented the construction necessary to meet New York citizens’ housing needs.

The irony is that some of the policies most responsible for New York’s outrageously high real estate prices are precisely the policies meant to alleviate the problems of high prices. It reminds me of Mises’ observations on the decline of the Roman Empire. In Rome, strict price ceilings held down the prices of grain and wine, and made it impossible to profit by growing these necessities. In NYC, the same goes for housing. Is there any doubt that, if one could simply buy a plot of land and build on it without government interference, building a tall building and selling every unit for $2,000,000 would be a profitable venture? New construction would quickly reduce prices in a free market. That’s not to say a Manhattan apartment would be as cheap as one in Houston; Manhattan is an island and many people want to live there. However, housing there would be a lot cheaper if restrictions were few.

Regulations are most dangerous when they provide short-term relief from the problems they cause. Societies that fail to recognize the long-term consequences of these policies are like alcoholics who drink to solve their problems.

The post NYC Apartments Cost as Much as Castles (and People Just Don’t Get Why) appeared first on The Economics Detective.

Food Socialism Coming to an EU Near You!

The EU is legislating away food speculation to decrease food price volatility. This could not possibly backfire.

Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley together made an estimated £2.2 billion from speculating on food including wheat, maize and soy between 2010 and 2012. Speculation increases price volatility and has been a major factor in the sharp spikes in global food prices of the last six years.

These two sentences utterly contradict one another. If food speculation increases price volatility,  then the speculators must be buying food when prices are high, thus driving up the prices, and selling food when prices are low, thus depressing prices. If speculators did that, they would hemorrhage money. But the  first sentence said they were earning money!

If people don’t smarten up and learn some economics, laws like this one will eventually lead to what Mises called “socialism of the German pattern.” If the response to every perceived bad outcome (e.g. food price volatility) is regulation, and the result of the regulation is to exacerbate bad outcomes, eventually the economy will be so heavily regulated that it be an effective command economy. Though the means of production will still be nominally owned by private individuals, the state will control them.

The post Food Socialism Coming to an EU Near You! appeared first on The Economics Detective.